The Untold Story Of The Last Man On The Moon | Apollo 17 | Spark

Spark

2 млн көрүүлөр1 273

    The remarkable story of the determination and courage of a generation. A tribute to three brave astronauts and the thousands of men and women behind them during the final days of NASA's Apollo program.
    Subscribe to Spark for more amazing science, tech and engineering videos - goo.gl/LIrlur
    Follow us on Facebook: SparkDocs/
    Follow us on Instagram: spark_channel?hl=undefined
    Content licensed from Espresso to Little Dot Studios. Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
    #TheMoon #Apollo #NASA #spark #sparkdocumentary #sciencedocumentary

    күнү жарыяланды Жыл мурун

    Жорумдар

    1. 1Skeptik1

      I was 18 and wore a NAVY uniform in 1969. To say America 50 years later is a great disappointment is a gross understatement. We were the land of opportunity and of great achievement and now America is the land of entitlement and a nation in decline. That little cloth mask tells much as to our dismal state of affairs and citizens are fleeing from NOT going to California. Shame on us!

    2. Wings 99

      A truly wonderful and awe inspiring film. Thank you

    3. Hamidou Seck

      Great documentary

    4. Ash Singh

      Did it really sparkle when it took off from the moon lol ?

      1. Atlas

        No. This is likely a quirk of the recording equipment.

      2. rockethead7

        Why the "lol" after your question? The answer is that the RCA field sequential scanning camera only had one vidicon pickup tube (instead of the normal three). They did this to save size/weight. As a result, however, the way they made colors was to put a spinning color wheel behind the lens, in front of the pickup. Unfortunately, this degrades the picture quality, and results in rainbow colors any time something moved too fast in frame (the spinning wheel and pickup couldn't work fast enough to match the movement of the objects). But, it meant that they didn't have to have a huge camera on the front of the rover, so, yes, that's what was selected.

      3. eventcone

        No. That's just how this particular type of camera saw it.

    5. M. Murray

      Humans are awesome. If we come together we can be in the starts.

    6. Dan Harakis

      Even if we could travel to the moon it would be impossible to land

      1. Atlas

        That's nonsense.

    7. Random Cancuck

      Well Russia did beat the Americans into space what do you think launched the space race? If it had of been the goal of the Russians to land on the moon they could have and it would have been a lot easier for them to do it than the Americans because they were far behind the Russians. Do Americans tell the truth about anything? And if it wasn't the Russians getting into space that launched that race then something else did and I would guess that the Russians and American and others were working with each other even though they were trying to convince the public otherwise.

      1. Atlas

        No, they couldn't. They tried hard, but failed.

      2. rockethead7

        YOU SAID: "Well Russia did beat the Americans into space" == Congratulations on the only thing you said that's correct. YOU SAID: "what do you think launched the space race?" == Well, the "space race" was quite literally the race to the moon. Prior to then, yes, loosely, you could maybe argue that there was a space race. But, with no stated finish line, it's not really much of a race. The real "space race" started when the USA set the goal ("finish line") of putting a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth. YOU SAID: "If it had of been the goal of the Russians to land on the moon" == Um, WHAT?? You don't think the Soviets had the goal of putting men on the moon? Pfftttt. Um, explain why they built and flew 4 lunar landers in space (test flights)? If they didn't have the goal of landing on the moon, why did they build those 4 lunar landers, with more under construction? Why did they build the N1 rocket, if not to go to the moon? Good grief. YOU SAID: "they could have" == But, they didn't. Their N1 rockets kept exploding. They never got them to work right. And, they ended up killing a bunch of their prime rocket engineers with loose safety standards, trying to get missions up into space by skipping basic things like draining the fuel out of the rockets before working on them. YOU SAID: "and it would have been a lot easier for them to do it than the Americans" == Hilarious!!! Um, what? Then why didn't they just go? They had the lander. They had named the astronauts and trained them. They were working toward that goal. Oh, um, that's right, wait, their N1 rockets kept exploding. How "easy" was that to deal with? YOU SAID: "because they were far behind the Russians." == At first, yes. But, the USA surpassed the Soviets quite quickly during the Gemini program. YOU SAID: "Do Americans tell the truth about anything?" == I am truthfully telling you that you are an ignorant clown. YOU SAID: "And if it wasn't the Russians getting into space that launched that race then something else did and I would guess that the Russians and American and others were working with each other" == Yes, and no. They didn't work with each other to go to the moon. But, after the space race to the moon was completed (USA won), the Soviets and the USA worked with each other on the Apollo-Soyuz program. YOU SAID: "even though they were trying to convince the public otherwise." == Was it drugs? Is that what ruined your brain? Or, were you born this way?

    8. Apollo Skyfacer

      WARNING ALERT ! Incoming idiotic comments by the adherents of the Flat Earth & Magical Dome Cult, and other nincompoops of the lunatic fringe. That'd include Apollo Moon Landing deniers.

    9. believe me

      Just can't believe so many smart people with bad teeth.

    10. Ulysses Flotildes

      All fake. Dont be conceived.

      1. Atlas

        Wrong.

      2. eventcone

        Some weird new form of birth control...?

      3. rockethead7

        I'm sure that's what your parents wished happened about you.

    11. Eduard Šajgalik

      Anyone else here because of the chapel bell?

    12. Wilbur Collins

      What a shame

    13. Arshad Khan

      This looks so Hollywood. Everything sounds and looks so fake

      1. Arshad Khan

        @Andre in that case, research operation paperclip and you will find your Nazi daddy von braun

      2. Arshad Khan

        You seem like full of shit to me. LOOK ELSEWHERE!!!

      3. Andre

        @Arshad Khan _"who directed the fake moon landings?"_ Nobody directed them, because there were not faked. As I said: You wrote a lot of nonsense.

      4. Andre

        @Arshad Khan _"you did not read the whole thing."_ I did. You wrote quite a lot bollocks. _"So look elsewhere"_ Request denied.

      5. Arshad Khan

        @Andre you did not read the whole thing. So look elsewhere

    14. colan powel

      Why do people believe everything they see during their younger years, from their teens up to their late 40's, like the moon landing as an example?

      1. rockethead7

        @Atlas The bigger irony in what you're asking is really about how these people believe everything a conspiracy video says without fact-checking anything... then accuse the sane people of doing exactly what they're doing... believing everything without fact-checking. So, as you probably noticed, the conspiracy flake asked me to tell him some of the evidence that goes beyond just believing everything I see on TV (he expected I wouldn't be able to answer), then ran for the hills the moment he realized he was in over his head. But, he's now out there somewhere, still ignoring reality, still thinking that everyone else is doing exactly what he's actually doing. That's one of these huge ironies about these insane people. They really do think that the sane people are the gullible ones, meanwhile, the conspiracy nutjobs are the ones who swallow everything they see (that aligns with their delusions) without fact-checking any of it.

      2. Atlas

        why do people believe dumb conspiracy theories they read about on the internet?

      3. rockethead7

        @colan powel So, basically, you're saying that you're unaware of any other method of confirming Apollo outside of watching the TV coverage??? Holy cow, how ridiculous are you?? What method of verification would you accept?? Have you even thought about it? Have you looked for other methods of verifying Apollo? Or, did you just think it was TV alone, then committed your slander from that point forward? Let's see, if I wanted to write all of the evidence for Apollo that goes beyond the "normal" things (photos and videos), it would probably take me about 6 years and 10 or 20 thousand pages to summarize it all. So, I'll just pick a "top ten" list (there are a thousand more, but I'll limit it here): 1) Arizona State University's LRO has been returning photographs of the lunar surface for about 12 years now. There are literally hundreds of photos from just about every sun angle possible, showing the remnants of Apollo, landers, rovers, rover tracks, shadows of flags still standing, etc. It has been managed by dozens of professors and hundreds of students over the years. 2) Apollo reflectors left on the moon on three of the missions. I myself have operated one of the laser ranging facilities that bounce lasers off of those reflectors (sometime around the time you were born). There are literally dozens of facilities around the world, managed by universities and governments, in dozens of countries. Those reflectors provide such accurate feedback (accuracy within inches) that we now use those facilities to track the motion of Earth's continents (tectonic plate movement) by bouncing lasers off of the Apollo reflectors on the moon, and other satellite reflectors put up for those exact purposes. 3) Numerous countries tracked all of the Apollo missions with radar and/or radio telescopes, including our enemies. USA mainland, Australia, Guam, Spain, Great Britain, Wales, Turks & Caicos, Madagascar, Indian Ocean ships, Pacific Ocean ships, Hawaii, etc., the list goes on. It's a common misperception that the primary guidance for Apollo was the onboard computers and inertial guidance gyros and g-meters. No. That was the secondary guidance mechanism for most of the trip. It only became the primary guidance mechanism for the actual landing. For the majority of the trip to the moon, the primary guidance was the ground based radar tracking information that was coming in from all of those different countries (using their own facilities that they managed, not from US bases in their countries). You can still visit those tracking stations today. Most of them are still active to track things in space (upgraded electronics, but usually the very same dishes used on Apollo missions). 4) The Soviets sent Luna 15 (unmanned probe) to meet Apollo 11 at the moon. It launched a few days ahead of Apollo 11, then waited for Apollo 11 to arrive in lunar orbit. The plan was to wait for the astronauts to be on the lunar surface, then send the Soviet lander to the Sea of Tranquility while the astronauts were still there, then race Apollo 11 back home with the first lunar samples. Unfortunately for them, they made an error and crashed it into a lunar mountain. But, the point remains, the Soviets tracked Apollo 11 and their Luna 15 the entire time, and published those facts in their own newspapers and publications. Also, our tracking stations tracked their Luna 15 to make sure they weren't really trying to crash it into Apollo 11. 5) Spain took long range photography of the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon. They had the most powerful telescope at the time. They also photographed the Apollo 13 debris field. 6) Japan sent their JAXA/Selene orbiter to the moon, which took photographs in 2D and 3D which have confirmed all of the Apollo photography in a level of detail that simply wasn't available in 1969-1972 (except by actually being on the moon). They have an entire section of their website dedicated to how Selene has helped them confirm Apollo (there are more ways in which they have done it also). 7) China says that their orbiter has confirmed Apollo also using their cameras. But, I'll grant you, they do not share very much from their space program, and want to keep their space camera capabilities a secret, so they don't release their photographs. But, nonetheless, they say they have used it to see the Apollo remnants on the moon, and there's no way in the world that they would have done that unless they actually found Apollo remnants there. If they could expose the USA as lying about Apollo, they'd do it in a heartbeat, and had everything to gain, and nothing to lose. Yet, the opposite happened, and they confirmed Apollo. 8) Thousands upon thousands of geologists and geology students have analyzed the rocks brought back from the moon by the Apollo astronauts. Not a single one of their publications have stated that they thought those rocks were faked in any way. In fact, they were dated billions of years old, and found to have never been exposed to oxygen or moisture (good luck finding that on Earth). 9) Apollo's live video was received and decoded by Australia and Spain and Goldstone, California. Goldstone could only be used 1/3rd of the time. Australia and Spain handled the video streams the rest of the time, by using their own dishes, and own personnel. Thousands of people from around the world were involved in designing and building this communications network (DSN) for Apollo. Other countries received the video signals also (but, it's unlikely they had the equipment to decode it). 10) The live audio was open channel analog, no encoding whatsoever, and was received around the world from dozens of countries with their dishes pointed at the moon. And, actually, anybody could receive it if they had decent equipment. There were backyard amateurs in countries around the world who received Apollo's audio. This especially consisted of the backyard amateurs who had been bouncing their radio signals off of the moon to talk to people on the other side of the world, for decades before Apollo went there. That very same equipment (slightly modified for the correct frequency) could be used to point at the moon, and receive the S-band audio signals from the lunar module. Maybe you'd know these things if you actually tried to find out... rather than sitting there like a dullard, thinking that TV was the only way to know Apollo happened. Good grief. Stop using your utter ignorance as a reason to slander thousands of people. I mean, not a single one of the world's 72 space agencies has ever expressed any doubt about the Apollo missions. These are staffed with the most prominent aerospace engineers and physicists that the world has to offer. Why do you doubt it? What possible reason would you have to assume otherwise? Why would you think TV was the only mechanism to know Apollo happened? What's wrong with your brain? The time to doubt things is when you know something about it that contradicts what the rest of the world knows. You obviously know absolutely nothing. Sorry, but you can't use "nothing" as a reason to doubt the expertise of the rest of the world's professionals in this industry. Blindly trusting people is a bad idea. But, blindly rejecting things that you know absolutely nothing about is an even worse idea.

      4. colan powel

        ​@rockethead7 I was born in the early 80's and you know how cracked up things were that period, I want to hear without arguing. I'll be delighted to hear wheat you have to say, besides News/TV shows what other resources proved convincing info. that satisfied your trust?

      5. rockethead7

        @colan powel What? What ARE you talking about? What does COVID have to do with Apollo? I know you're trying to make some sort of analogy, but, it just falls short. I have no idea what you're talking about, or what your underlying analogy is supposed to mean. Do you think that the only way we know about Apollo is because of TV news?

    15. Carl Boutilier

      Gozzae1is better..

    16. Carl Boutilier

      Gozzae

    17. Cam montreuil engines

      Carry more weight if he wasn't a womanizer.

    18. Aerowise

      What a hoax. JFK assassins are part of the deep state. Q?

      1. Andre

        @Aerowise _"Jesus is Lord"_ Jesus is dead and never was a lord of any kind. He was just a human that went nuts.

      2. Atlas

        @Aerowise Hail Satan

      3. Aerowise

        @Atlas You will see... Jesus is Lord

      4. Atlas

        q anon is a farce.

    19. Aerowise

      Never did. Hoax

    20. Aerowise

      If you did it once, with the lackluster technology, and the extraordinary technology we have now, you could do it in an instant, what a lie what a hoax wake up people

      1. eventcone

        What "extraordinary technology" do you imagine we have now that would make a return to the moon so very much easier?

    21. Aerowise

      Lies

    22. Aerowise

      Cameras prove Deciet

    23. Aerowise

      No mention of Christ Proof of lie Get real. Be saved.

    24. Aerowise

      TDC Show the truth

    25. Aerowise

      Today? Show it. Today! They don’t cuz we know

    26. Aerowise

      No gravity? Boulders don’t roll to busting. Busted

    27. Aerowise

      What? No arrowheads?

    28. Aerowise

      Ask God

      1. Andre

        There is no "God".

    29. Aerowise

      Why would they bring Duxt tape. Lies

    30. Aerowise

      Siesmic charges. ? Uh huh

    31. Aerowise

      Duct tape! Ha!

    32. Aerowise

      The Rover Film angles prove false

    33. Aerowise

      Their conversation is evident of hoax.

    34. Aerowise

      If you believe this, tell me why there’s no stars. This was the first lie, the first hoax, the deep state, they must be disassembled and cast off like chef!

    35. Homer's Home

      Does Space have winds? I thought I saw the flag wave a little 🤔

      1. eventcone

        No you didn't.

    36. Homer's Home

      Does Space have winds? I thought I saw the flag wave a little 🤔

    37. ximal popoca

      "the Earth is our Cradle, but we can't stay in the Cradle forever" ... right! This niche in the Galaxy & beyond is all ours to keep growing & learning forever!

    38. Larry Ariscon

      We are HUMANS of intelligence, We are good!

    39. AudioSlave

      Lol I can nuke moon easily 😎

    40. Joseph Azzopardi

      What is that dot at 20.40?

      1. Joseph Azzopardi

        @rockethead7 yes noticed now

      2. Joseph Azzopardi

        @rockethead7 ok could be

      3. rockethead7

        @Joseph Azzopardi Are you talking about the shadow of the lander?

      4. Joseph Azzopardi

        @rockethead7 . No there is like a dark dot approaching the space ship at 20.40

      5. rockethead7

        Are you talking about the shadow of the lander?

    41. Johnny Urenda

      The whole thing was for Russias eyes. To this day Nasa lies about everything they do, prime government action. No lie.

    42. Randolph Lex

      Why do.the crazies comment

    43. Camden Gillespie

      gotta love how the public ruins everything good about everything

      1. D W

        Communist’s at work!

    44. george fulk

      Another great video! Well done.

    45. phil mcnamara

      They risked there life’s and gave there all truly inspirational documentry

    46. Juanito Jr. Vinluan

      did somebody noticed a spark travelled on the left side of the screen so fast mins. 19:16-19:19? seen under challenger, while on dispatch, as it goes down on the moon?

      1. rockethead7

        Yes, a loose piece of mylar, perhaps. Or, maybe an ice crystal that got dislodged. If you go watch all of the mission video, you'll see plenty of loose stuff floating around. In particular, on Apollo 16, they said it looked like a snowstorm because a bunch of paint and junk had gotten dislodged and flaked off of some of the equipment. They have it on video.

    47. Minong Maniac

      Wonder what kind of advanced ancient tech they went to get. Wonder if we got kicked off the moon and banned from above low orbit space travel, and why.

    48. MultiAkitainu

      500 miles away? I thingk 5 miles !

    49. Tom Schwab

      This Dude was right, if we can't successfully "STAY" on the Moon for months on end, further away would be Ludacris !! MAKE A MOON BASE. . . fuk, I'll even volunteer !

    50. Chris McCauley

      I have many questions but my number one question is how does the radios reach earth from the moon

      1. rockethead7

        Oversimplifying here, radio is basically the same thing as light. It's all part of the electromagnetic spectrum, travels at the same speed, gets generated basically the same way, just operates at a different frequency. If light can make it that far, so can radio.

    51. Siysa Subair

      Rest in peace people who were sacrifies their lives of behalf of human impression.their bravary voyages will never die.

    52. Abdullah Tarmoom

      The fretful burn moberly ski because commission accordantly surprise pace a psychedelic cold. equable, extra-large extra-small exuberant step-sister

      1. Kyle Laurent

        The only thing that is not a problem for you to understand what you think about this summer and winter months ago. Surprise that the computers were made with the particles of dust behind linar to get banned.

    53. Saint MTE

      I'm sorry but WHOEVER does not have ANY doubts about walking the moon needs to do SERIOUS RESEARCH on the history of U.S to see why people don't believe this ever happened.

      1. rockethead7

        @Saint MTE In one ear, out the other. I posed a bunch of questions/challenges. You ignored every single word. You didn't address ANYTHING I asked. And, instead, like all conspiratards, all you've done is duck and dodge, and then change topics. That's all you people ever do. Not a single one of you people know what you're talking about. None of you. YOU SAID: "Ok Einstein, so where are the deleted documents???" == What deleted documents? Which documents are you looking for? Or, did you just blindly trust a conspiracy video that told you documents were deleted? YOU SAID: "All I hear from you is that you do not feel U.S were SMART enough to pull off a fake moon journey." == Nobody is "smart enough" to fake radar and radio telescope signals. They cannot be faked. Nobody is "smart enough" to prevent future generations from sending probes to the moon to either find Apollo evidence (or not find it). Nobody is "smart enough" to make lasers reflect off of reflectors on the moon, if the reflectors aren't there. YOU SAID: "You don't think they had some of the smartest minds around to build a narrative around why it was indeed REAL. Think about it. You blast a rocket off into space, but it doesn't ACTUALLY ever get there but the trackers that were on that shuttle were ALSO in the hands of the U.S and they used that to manipulate info." == Congratulations on failing to read ANYTHING. Um, dummy, the Soviets tracked our craft too. I also listed a bunch of other countries that tracked our craft. You don't know what you're talking about. YOU SAID: "Not to mention how the men that were on the moon could not speak about it. Why do you think that was?" == That makes no sense. They all spoke about it. Lectures. Books. Interviews. What ARE you talking about? YOU SAID: "The ACTUAL PEOPLE THAT WERE THERE cannot (or more accurately NOT ALLOWED to) give you detailed accounts of what happened. EXPLAIN THAT??" == Sure, the explanation is that you don't have the foggiest clue what you're talking about. All of the mission debriefs are available. They all wrote books about their experiences. There are countless interviews. You could talk to them yourself and ask any questions you want. There are only four of them left alive. You should go meet them. YOU SAID: "But instead you want to listen to the accounts of people that WERE NOT THERE????" == I never made any such claim. Where are you getting this idea from? I merely understand that you will not listen to the actual astronauts themselves, because you are too busy slandering them to actually pay attention to what they say. So, I pointed out that you can find numerous 3rd party evidence. But, did you even listen to yourself here?? If you're saying that you want me to listen to the actual astronauts who went to the moon, and THAT is your ultimate authority, you just shot yourself in the foot, dummy. All of them said they went to the moon. YOU are disregarding what they say, not me. YOU SAID: "What type of logic is that." == Oh, the irony. You want me to listen to the actual moonwalkers... while you are the one who won't listen to them. YOU SAID: [insert a pile of utter nonsense that has nothing to do with Apollo] == Just more distractions. Just more ducking and dodging. Your understanding of Apollo is so crippled that you felt the need to change topics to mortgages and pedophile sex rings. That's how little you understand about Apollo. You can't deal with the Apollo topic, so, your only recourse is to change topics. No, I'm not responding about your insane attempts to distract and dodge. YOU SAID: "Looool Like you didn't watch VIDEOS yourself to come to your conclusion." == No, dummy. Video evidence is some of the weakest evidence. I mean, sure, I've watched all of the Apollo videos. But, they have little bearing about how I know about Apollo. I'm sorry that you think videos are an education, but, you're wrong. YOU SAID: "YOOUU watched videos that confirmed it was real FOR YOU." == Nope. YOU SAID: "IIIII watched the same videos, but then watched OTHER VIDEOS (took two sets of notes, that you are calling CONSPIRACY VIDEOS), and came to MY OWN CONCLUSIONS." == No, you watched conspiracy videos, and swallowed everything they told you, hook line and sinker. YOU SAID: "Lastly" == Pfffttt. Lastly?? You haven't even begun to answer a single question or challenge I put forth. Not one. You ignored everything. And, this is your "lastly"?? Then, you ramble one like an insane maniac for more paragraphs after this? How is this "lastly"?? YOU SAID: "you do realise you COMPLETELY jumped the gun as I NEVER ACTUALLY said it was NOT REAL. I CLEARY said whoever does not have 'ANY DOUBTS'." == Sorry, wasn't born yesterday. You don't get to play that card here. We all know exactly what you think. YOU SAID: "But I see you cannot ask people to question something without them throwing their toys out the pram." == But, you AREN'T questioning. You're PRETENDING to question. IF you were actually questioning, you'd deal with the answers. But, you didn't. You ignored the answers. You refused to address anything. You let it all go in one ear and out the other. You ducked. You dodged. You avoided the topic. You changed topics to mortgages and sex traffic rings. And, now you're sitting there, again pretending to ask questions?? Um, no. That's not what you're doing. You pretend to ask questions because you know that's how to appear intellectually honest. You need to pretend you have an open mind. But, anybody can see right through you. You're shallow, and extremely dumb. YOU SAID: "Do some parts make sense to me. YES or course. Like why would they make AAALLL that effort to fake something like this. With all others reporting that they also tracked the journey. But I feel that U.S had ENOUGH INTELLIGENCE to pull it off." == How? How did they fake the laser effects on the reflectors Apollo left on the moon? How did they, in 1969-1972, prepare to fake Japan out in 2008, when their orbiter confirmed Apollo? How did they make it so China would then confirm Apollo again a couple of years ago? How did they make it so that Arizona State University's LRO would confirm Apollo starting in 2009, and still confirming it today? Sorry, you don't get to just brush that under the rug as "enough intelligence to pull it off." I mean, good grief, at that point, why not just go to the moon? Why not just go?!!?!?! If they had the capability to put all of the Apollo artifacts on the moon to be discovered by probes decades later, why not just go?? Sheeesssshhhh. Do you even listen to yourself? You're crediting NASA and its contractors with the intelligence to pull off "faking" going to the moon, but you apparently don't give them the credit to just go to the moon instead of faking it? Why not just go? They had the rockets big enough to do the job. Why not just go? YOU SAID: "And like I mentioned, what was the point in deleting ALLL the evidence??" == Your conspiracy videos told you it's deleted. But, that's pure insanity. What EXACT evidence are you looking for? YOU SAID: "'Oh because it was not needed anymore'. WAIT..WHATT!!?!?! So they CLEARLY KNEW people MAY have doubts that they ever went there so instead of keeping the evidence to show them in case of any questions, they delete them. But not only do they delete them, they tell the astronauts to NEVER speak on it, and I should just sit back like a good ol' boy and believe EVERY LITTLE THING THEY SAY. So I should believe a country on such a matter when they KNOWN to lie to their citizens TIME AND TIME AGAIN." == None of that makes any sense. None of the evidence is "deleted." They lost two backup tapes from one mission. The primary copies are all still intact, and countless other copies. But, every year that goes by since they announced that the two backup tapes were lost, you conspiratards keep escalating what you think is missing. And, now, you insane maniacs have escalated it to the point of thinking everything has been deleted. It's pure nonsense. You don't know what you're talking about. YOU SAID: "Yeah, errrmm mate, you can gladly be one, but I don't plan on being ANYONE'S FOOL!!!" == Oh, the irony. You are a massive fool, and you don't need anybody's help to show it. You're showing it just fine on your own.

      2. Saint MTE

        @rockethead7 Lastly you do realise you COMPLETELY jumped the gun as I NEVER ACTUALLY said it was NOT REAL. I CLEARY said whoever does not have 'ANY DOUBTS'. But I see you cannot ask people to question something without them throwing their toys out the pram. Do some parts make sense to me. YES or course. Like why would they make AAALLL that effort to fake something like this. With all others reporting that they also tracked the journey. But I feel that U.S had ENOUGH INTELLIGENCE to pull it off. And like I mentioned, what was the point in deleting ALLL the evidence?? 'Oh because it was not needed anymore'. WAIT..WHATT!!?!?! So they CLEARLY KNEW people MAY have doubts that they ever went there so instead of keeping the evidence to show them in case of any questions, they delete them. But not only do they delete them, they tell the astronauts to NEVER speak on it, and I should just sit back like a good ol' boy and believe EVERY LITTLE THING THEY SAY. So I should believe a country on such a matter when they KNOWN to lie to their citizens TIME AND TIME AGAIN. Yeah, errrmm mate, you can gladly be one, but I don't plan on being ANYONE'S FOOL!!!

      3. Saint MTE

        @rockethead7 Ok Einstein, so where are the deleted documents??? All I hear from you is that you do not feel U.S were SMART enough to pull off a fake moon journey. You don't think they had some of the smartest minds around to build a narrative around why it was indeed REAL. Think about it. You blast a rocket off into space, but it doesn't ACTUALLY ever get there but the trackers that were on that shuttle were ALSO in the hands of the U.S and they used that to manipulate info. Not to mention how the men that were on the moon could not speak about it. Why do you think that was? The ACTUAL PEOPLE THAT WERE THERE cannot (or more accurately NOT ALLOWED to) give you detailed accounts of what happened. EXPLAIN THAT?? But instead you want to listen to the accounts of people that WERE NOT THERE???? What type of logic is that. They have been tricking people like you for YONKERS!!! Since time began. Let me guess you're a baby boomer and early Gen X that got a mortgage, wife and kids and retired (or try to retire) in your twilight years. After graduating I find out the amount of LIES I was told abt this world was RIDICULOUS. SOOOOO many cover ups that have happened like the pedophile sex rings, THE LIE that is the education system (teaching you about things that NEVER really benefit you in the real world). The WHOLE WORLD is a stage but I know your response...'hahaha you sound like a true conspiracy theorist'. Glad to be one as my findings have allowed me to break away from the norm, learn new things and amass an AMAZING amount of wealth I would NEVER have been able to had I stuck to WHAT I WAS SOLD FROM SCHOOL. You have to take two sets of notes in this world and that approach has TRULY saved my life. So you stick to what they tell you and don't as k any questions. NOTE: And you said... 'Sorry, but I'm already aware that your version of "serious research" is to watch conspiracy videos. Mine is to actually analyze how Apollo worked..' Looool Like you didn't watch VIDEOS yourself to come to your conclusion. YOOUU watched videos that confirmed it was real FOR YOU. IIIII watched the same videos, but then watched OTHER VIDEOS (took two sets of notes, that you are calling CONSPIRACY VIDEOS), and came to MY OWN CONCLUSIONS. Good luck.

      4. Saint MTE

        @Kyle Laurent If that is what YOU consider serious research, knock yourself out!!!

      5. Kyle Laurent

        When you say "serious research" you mean conspiracy blogs, right?

    54. Jeffrey Knight

      What an amazing time in our history. I believe that was the right time to explore the moon. It was exciting to watch each apollo missions. Thank you to all the brave astronauts who landed on the moon. I'm so glad that I was at the age to witness every landing. I really believe it will never happen again in my life time but, what a wonderful time to watch the apollo missions. The era may ended for the apollo missions but, it will live on in our hearts and memories forever.

      1. rockethead7

        Hang in there. There's a decent chance that Artemis will make it by 2028-2030.

    55. Thomas Frazier

      Don't see no mountains

    56. J PR

      Can you imagine how utterly frustrating it must be to be the command module pilot and know that you are sooo close to the lunar surface but will never get the chance to set foot on it...

      1. rockethead7

        Or, how about being Tom Stafford, who commanded Apollo 10, had a lander, was in the lander, and flew the landing approach down to the moon, but the mission was to abort the landing intentionally to test the systems for Apollo 11 to make the actual landing?

    57. Deo Shivute

      All the food that I ate, the pain that I went through, the breathing, drinking etc. Life is great. There is no other thing like life. God bless everyone 🙏 ❤ you.

    58. TrapTastical

      Bruh I thought they left a man on the moon.

    59. Bienvenido Bukiron

      Wow getting rocks from d moon what an accomplishment

    60. andy hughes

      How big inside was the lander ?

    61. Ogulin Ćulibrk

      earth is flat

    62. Adamantium

      13 mph on Earth: *yawn* good joggin pace 13 mph on moon: I almost pooped myself

    63. F F

      Why are we still wasting billions on this while millions here don't even have access to clean water let alone anything else. 😭

      1. rockethead7

        Because the best way to truly fight poverty isn't to just hand out money, but to put people to work.

    64. Dokta Bob

      Mars is about mining the asteroid belt, not ‘scientific curiosity’. China and United Arab Emirates are there too. Communists and Muslims showing ‘scientific curiosity’ at great expense ... You believe that ? You’re an easy mark.

      1. Dokta Bob

        @Atlas Gerard K O’Neill headed the think tank. His book ‘The High Frontier’ even includes the amortisation schedule submitted to Congress in the early 70s. When you understand it, you will see that is entirely feasible. It is also possible to create industrial zones in orbit to move the most most toxic industries off planet.And to beam energy to earth using microwaves. ‘We have ideas yet that we haven’t tried’ - Robert Frost

      2. Dokta Bob

        @Atlas The US Congress received the results of a 10 year think tank which enlisted postgrad engineers to work on a project to determine whether or not this was feasible. The results were submitted in the early 70s. Much of the technology was developed under the guise of Star Wars - the Space Defense Initiative - so it could be financed.

      3. Atlas

        Mining in space is nowhere near feasible.

    65. Chris Collier

      How could we have continued such an expensive project that would stand to benefit all mankind? We had wars to fight, create tax cuts for the wealthy, make millions of millionaires even billionaires to shoot for. We were an ambitious bunch. And besides that we would need a much smarter population and might have to spend money to educate everybody since it was clear there was no way to predict where the next Einstein would come from. “America. It’s all about me.”

    66. Unzila Unzila

      Colour on 🌓

    67. Bizarre Covers

      That was cool... yet 1.5k apparently didn’t like it. Who could dislike such achievement and exploration... Thanks for the upload, i really enjoyed this.

      1. Dick Johnson

        They are the same idiots that think this was all a hoax. That is why they do that.

    68. Anton Tisemite

      Why arent stars visible in space or on the moon? They seem to only be visible from earth

      1. rockethead7

        Because it's daytime. They saw plenty of stars from the night side of the moon.

      2. Atlas

        They are visible, you just don't see them in pictures because you need very specific camera settings to do that.

      3. eventcone

        Who ever said they weren't visible?

    69. Anton Tisemite

      The more footage i see of moon landings, the less i believe it actually happened. I am very conflicted on whether or not it happened because of many reasons and not just the fact that the videos are very.... Lets just say Obscure.

      1. rockethead7

        Given your other postings, I'd say your biggest problem about Apollo is ignorance.

      2. Atlas

        I'm also curious about what you think are obscure.

      3. eventcone

        What's "obscure" about them?

    70. Anton Tisemite

      So back then, we had only been to space a few times and orbited the moon a couple times, then we went ahead and landed and walked on the moon? No probes or in depth studies on its atmosphere or terrain? No knowledge of what to expect, yet, we just shot a multi million pound rocket/ shuttle to our moon and put human beings on its surface after hardly any studies of its conditions, but after all these mars probes and studies we havent stepped foot on it yet?

      1. rockethead7

        YOU SAID: "So back then, we had only been to space a few times and orbited the moon a couple times, then we went ahead and landed and walked on the moon?" == Yes. YOU SAID: "No probes or in depth studies on its atmosphere or terrain?" == Both the USA and Soviets sent many probes to the moon, fly-by missions, impactors, and soft-landers. Why do you believe there were none? Did a conspiracy video tell you that? YOU SAID: "No knowledge of what to expect, yet, we just shot a multi million pound rocket/ shuttle to our moon and put human beings on its surface after hardly any studies of its conditions, but after all these mars probes and studies we havent stepped foot on it yet?" == You do not know what you're talking about.

      2. eventcone

        "No knowledge of what to expect, yet, we just shot a multi million pound rocket/ shuttle to our moon and put human beings on its surface after hardly any studies of its conditions..." This is what hoax believers seem to think (or they want YOU to think it). They claim that the moonlandings must therefore have been faked, having done virtually NO RESEARCH of the history of the space race. One wonders how they can reach such an extraordinary conclusion from a basis of such ignorance. Prior to the launch of Apollo 11 (the first attempt at a moonlanding) the USA launched a total of 20 manned spaceflights (the Soviets had launched 13 manned spaceflights in the same period). The first 6 flights were from the Mercury program, which developed their experience at getting a man into space and returning him safely to Earth. Then followed 10 Gemini flights in which (having already decided on their strategy for a Moon mission) they tested and developed their procedures for every technique they would need for a Moon mission (changes in orbit, EVA, rendezvous, docking and working in space) BUT from the relative safety of Low Earth Orbit. Then came 4 Apollo flights in which they developed the procedures for navigation to and from the Moon, tested the spacecraft, and practiced rendezvous and docking in lunar orbit. All of this was suplemented by information from unmanned Lunar Orbiter and Surveyor programs whose spacecraft had preceded the Apollo craft to lunar orbit and to the lunar surface. In addition they had also made several successful test flights of their Saturn V moonrocket (the first two unmanned, 2 unmanned test flights of their CSM and 1 of the LM). Only THEN did they make the attempt at a lunar landing.

      3. Atlas

        What about the surveyor program? lunar orbiter program?

      4. eventcone

        There were several unmanned craft sent to explore the Moon before the first manned landing, both from orbit and from the surface.

    71. Lillian Coleman

      The nauseating linen objectively educate because poison suprisingly tow apud a precious bait. ill-informed, vast system

    72. travisinLA

      Hmmm...Why didn’t we ever go back? Can’t see stars in the footage

      1. lolo mo

        People lost interest in funding it because of the thought "yay we won, we beat the commie pricks. Next contest to beat them please!!". For stars, its daytime and camera is focused on the lunar surface to see stars

    73. Nelsa Dolit

      Its so fake...why then no follow up moon journey...what stops them...if it was successful indeed...

      1. Atlas

        Tricky Dick happened.

      2. eventcone

        This was the sixth "follow up moon journey". Then the US Congress cancelled all further funding for manned moonlandings until 2019. That's democracy. Not everyone wants to continually spend money on manned space exploration.

    74. Iddris Ibrahim

      Oh God pls help the world ,what r they doing to ur beautiful world u make

    75. Allowedtospeak

      The blue marble So delicate and vulnerable is our home and still we didn’t managed to make a vital impression on the people convincing them taking good care and deeply appreciate that gift from the universe We need to act now and protect mother Gaya.

    76. Vishal Kumar

      Who is watching from India?

    77. Bobby8270

      I worked on aircraft all my life. There is no way that vessel could have landed and taken off from the moon.

      1. Gruntol5

        What a tragedy that you have learned NOTHING so far in your life.

      2. Atlas

        Why?

      3. rockethead7

        Oh, and it takes a KGup clown 50 years to realize this? No aerospace engineers anywhere on Earth, in friendly or enemy countries, for the past 50 years have realized that the craft wasn't capable. Instead, the lunar module has become an icon in aerospace engineering, studied by generations of students who become engineers themselves, taking the lessons learned from the lunar module and applying them to spacecraft and satellites today. Oh, but the KGup clod comes along and thinks that's all wrong, and the place to expose this "hoax" is in a KGup comment? And, everyone should listen to you, huh? You offer no proof, no calculations, no evidence, no specifics, nothing. Just "there is no way" and leave it at that? You "worked on" aircraft? Like, what? Washed them? Sprayed de-ice formula onto the wings? Loaded the baggage? What does "worked on" mean to you, such that you think you have the expertise to say that the 7000 engineers and technicians at Grumman who designed and built the lunar module were all universally wrong about how they did their jobs?

    78. Beowulf Agate

      So many contradictory reports that which one is the truth is anybody’s guess and basically a total waste of resources that would have done so many Americans good but they decided to feed their egos instead . What a shame.

      1. eventcone

        "Ego feeding" no (that is reserved for the inventors of conspiracy theories). But propaganda for American industrial might against thst of a communist state, yes. I think that propaganda, at that time, was necessary and good. It cost a lot, but so do a lot of things. And the USA was the world's wealthiest nation.

    79. Eddie Keyton

      Where are the flat earthers and fake moon landing people 🧐👀🤣

    80. Forbidden Knowledge

      Is this for real .. man never went to the moon in a tin can, really if we did why can't we see the evidence with such powerful telescopes we have today ? It never happened like we were told, 911, covid, JFK, weapons of mass destruction..right 👍👍

      1. rockethead7

        YOU SAID: "Is this for real .." == Yes. YOU SAID: "man never went to the moon" == You know, normal people wait for an answer to questions before coming to a conclusion. Abnormal delusional people come to their conclusions first, then pretend to ask questions. YOU SAID: "in a tin can, really if we did why can't we see the evidence with such powerful telescopes we have today ?" == WHAT?!?!??!! Earth-based telescopes?!?!??!!?!?! Good gods. Well, look, it's fine that you don't understand physics and light. That's fine. Most people don't. But, the obscene part of what you're basically saying is that you think NOBODY understands it. Like, if you don't understand it, nobody does, therefore it's fake. That's basically what you're saying. I mean, did you really think that the entire world's physicists have overlooked this obvious answer?? Nobody has thought to look through a telescope before you?? Good grief. The amazing arrogance. See, a normal person would say, "I don't understand why we can't just look through a telescope, I guess I should find out why, then come to a conclusion. After all, it's such a simple thing to do, certainly there must be millions of people who have thought of doing that before I did. So, there must be a reason that I just don't understand." A delusional maniac says, "if we can't look through a telescope, Apollo was fake." == There isn't a telescope in existence with the resolution to see Apollo artifacts on the moon. It would take a lens (or mirror) 75 feet across to see a lunar module as a single dot. You wouldn't know what it was. It would only be a dot. If you want enough detail to know what it is, it would take a lens (or mirror) a quarter mile across to be able to see it. This is just the physics of light. It's called "optical resolution" if you want to look it up. On the wiki page for "optical resolution," you can scroll down to the formula for "lens size" and do the math yourself, if you don't believe me. Thus far, the largest optical grade lens ever built was 5 feet across, and costed $168 million. Yeah, we have a long way to go before we can construct optical grade lenses a quarter mile across. == Then, there's atmospheric distortion to worry about, but, that's another story. YOU SAID: "It never happened like we were told," == Again, paranoid delusional maniacs come to conclusions before getting answers to questions. Normal people wait for answers before coming to conclusions. YOU SAID: "911, covid, JFK, weapons of mass destruction..right 👍👍" == Did drugs do this to you? Is that the cause?

    81. eres El Salvador

      WHY THE DUST FALL LIKE IN EART, HOW MUCH ELIO GOT IN THE TANK XD

      1. eventcone

        It doesn't. It falls like it does on the Moon.

    82. esvin8771

      Watching the journey footage brought tears to my eyes, it's amazing to be that people think the landings were faked, but they don't understand space, if you were out in space and you through a ball at 5mph that ball would move at 5mph in a straight line for millions of years or even forever as long as it didn't crash into something or it didn't get close to anything with gravity, so once the rocket is out of Earth's atmosphere and gravity the rest is just time, leaving Earth is the hard part along with the return, but this is amazing, I wish everyone would realize how we as humans on Earth haven't even accomplished to speak one universal language yet, and we still have pretend boundaries to separate ourselves and call this nations, but look how far we can make it if we work together to reach the stars, our planet will end one day, it's inevitable, eventually the sun will pull us in, I believe Mercury is next but there was a planet before Mercury that's already been pulled in, we need to learn how to survive in the universe off planets, let's explore infinity.

    83. esvin8771

      If I made it to the moon and died on return ... Id be at peace after what my last memories of life would be I'd be fulfilled.

    84. Satanic Panic

      These guys went bat shit crazy and apparently used actors to deal with the public went "they" returned! We traded technology secrets with some kind of being in exhange for freedom to fuck with our minds randomly! Jesus is a lie and all religion is bogus folks!

    85. Marla Plunk

      Wondering why all the documentaries lately about the Apollo/NASA programs are by British crews? Americans are like.. meh. Brits are like.. WOW!!

    86. BIG PP

      In Operation Paperclip, German scientists were taken to the U.S. to develop military technology, that work fed the space program. The man leading this was a former German Nazi his name is Wernher von Braun

    87. Tribal Reubenites

      GOD BLESS MANKIND-and just maybe one day the human race can get along together Amen 😇💙❤️

      1. Tribal Reubenites

        @Dick Johnson HTTR!!

      2. Dick Johnson

        Get off my lawn!!

      3. Mario giddiani Ibarra

        It’s not the masses but the leaders of those masses which do not get along and use the masses as pawns in their pointless wars and violence.

      4. iZac Stein

        @Tribal Reubenites A pineapple.

      5. Tribal Reubenites

        @iZac Stein ,, then you must be referring to the Tower of Babel. As man stopped working together, as one particular form of language in one particular region became many new languages, which probably the cause-new social groups couldn't get along together..

    88. Curt Coller

      We can't stay in a cradle forever, but we can wait until we are mature enough! Right now we are far from that. Do you agree?

    89. Domzdream

      I really hate being in the category of disbelievers in the moon lands, but bloody hell! look at frames (34:42 - 34:55) - that is clearly a man dangling by the hios on really thin cables. Look at the way he falls. Given the fact that those suits are really heavy! plsu the guy is gunning super fast....he doesnt tumble. His belly doestnt even touch the ground when he wipes! You wanan know why? The cables at the hips are stopping his tumbling motion, and he hardly lands heavily....because of the cables. Watch now how he gets up! He's at a complete angle! Again, those suits are really heavy! You'd think he'd struggle to get up for a few seconds at least! nope! He just lifts up liek it's made of paper, remains at an angle that youd expect anything to topple over! But no, he's just fine. Off he goes. Now you could call me names and throw shit at me, but consider seeing this without bias! If you strip away the peer pressure you all fall under, and closely observe, maybe you can see that they were absolutely NOT on the moon. Mind you, I'm not saying they didnt land on the moon. I'm saying that THESE films, all of them! were not filmed on the moon. Again, I hate to be in this category of people, because I'm nto really a conspiracy nut. But when you see bullshit in a thing, you should call it!

      1. eventcone

        @Domzdream The Soviets were "at least a DECADE of experience ahead of the americans"?? Let's see: 1st Soviet satellite - Oct 1957 1st American satellite - Jan 1958 1st Soviet in space/orbit - April 1961 1st American in space - May 1961 1st American in orbit - Feb 1962 1st Soviet spacewalk - March 1965 1st American spacewalk - June 1965 1st Soviet rendezvous - Oct 1968 1st American rendezvous - Dec 1965 1st Soviet docking - Jan 1969 1st American docking - March 1966 There's more, but that's enough to see that the Americans went from being slightly behind at the beginning of the space race to being far ahead, well before the 1st Moon flights were attempted. So why allege that the Soviets were a decade ahead?

      2. rockethead7

        @Domzdream YOU SAID: "Ok. This is gonna take me a couple days to read becauseI can see you started crying there and got all emotional" == Good grief, what an idiot. YOU are the one who posted a long stream of garbage. Don't blame me if it takes a long time to clean up your mess. YOU SAID: "calling me a maniac, because I'm skeptical" == That's not what skepticism is. That's the OPPOSITE of skepticism, you just don't realize it. YOU SAID: "about a few astronauts who ''apparently'' went to the moon completely unscathed, when even the Russians" == Yeah? The Soviets, who tracked all of the Apollo missions to the moon and back with radar and/or radio telescopes, just like many other countries did? Those guys? Hey, dummy, you don't even get to mention the Russians if you don't know what role they played. YOU SAID: "(who were a t least a DECADE) of experience ahead of americans," == WHAT?!?!!?!?! A ***DECADE***?? Good gods. The Soviets put their first cosmonaut into space on April 12, 1961. The USA put its first astronaut into space on May 5, 1961. They weren't even a MONTH ahead, let alone a decade. Good grief. You're just making this stuff up as you go along. They were ahead of the USA in total lifting capability, but, that was by around 8-9 months, still nowhere near a decade. YOU SAID: "wouldn't send their best men into space" == They wouldn't? So, the cosmonauts they sent into space were their worst, not their best? What?? Where do you get this garbage? YOU SAID: "knowing very well they'd come back at least completely with radiation to the point of being scorched alive." == You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Oh, but hey, thanks for confirming that you are an all-out Apollo denier, not the "open minded" guy you pretended. I mean, I saw right through it, of course. Anybody could. But, your position was "well, maybe they went to the moon, but the videos are fake." Now, since you're insisting that they couldn't survive the radiation, you're basically exposing exactly what was obvious anyway, that you're actually saying that they didn't go. Of course, again, you're welcome to publish your numbers, crackpot. Why are you on KGup? Why would you think that radiation in space would scorch them? What type of radiation? How much of it do you think there was? Why aren't there any radiobiologists who say this?? Why aren't there any cosmologists who say this?? What is the source of this amazing radiation that scorches people in space? YOU SAID: "Anyway. Dry those tears off....give me a couple of days to read the over emotional text, and I'll get back to you." == Don't bother. You're an idiot.

      3. Domzdream

        @rockethead7 Ok. This is gonna take me a couple days to read becauseI can see you started crying there and got all emotionaland shit, started calling me a maniac, because I'm skeptical about a few astronauts who ''apparently'' went to the moon completely unscathed, when even the Russians (who were a t least a DECADE) of experience ahead of americans, wouldn't send their best men into space knowing very well they'd come back at least completely fucked with radiation to the point of being scorched alive. Anyway. Dry those tears off....give me a couple of days to read the over emotional text, and I'll get back to you.

      4. rockethead7

        Sorry for the order and structure of my replies. I tried posting my reply many times, but KGup kept censoring something for an unknown crazy reason. KGup censorship has gone out of control lately, and many of my messages just don't get posted, for no reason whatsoever, and it ends up being a mess. Anyway, look, crazy clown, the reason you hear these things "a million times" from people is because they are correct, and you are wrong. There's a very distinct reason that you don't find your objections heralded by physicists and mathematicians and aerospace engineers, and that reason is because those people understand this topic, and you do not. I mean, good grief, your entire objection can be obliterated by simply realizing that sometimes they were on a hill, therefore the rover was also on that hill, therefore the camera was on that hill also (thus messing up the viewing angles, so things will look more slanted). And, combine that with the fact that they weighed under 60 pounds on the moon, standing up is going to be easier than on Earth. Listen to yourself. Think before you speak (write). Good grief. You're accusing these astronauts of being criminals, because one of them stood up easily in the moon's gravity? You're accusing them of being criminals because their bellies didn't hit the ground when they fell?? THAT's your basis to accuse the astronauts, and thousands of others, of committing crimes that would land them in prison for the rest of their lives? You have lost your mind.

      5. rockethead7

        YOU SAID: "Again, those suits are really heavy!" == 88 pound suit. 80 pound PLSS. 20 pound OPS and radio. Yeah, 188 pounds. Divide by 6 to adjust to the moon's gravity. It's 31 pounds. They themselves weighed let's say 160-165 pounds (a typical weight of an Apollo astronaut). Divide by 6, and the astronaut weighs 27 pounds. Total weight that the astronaut's legs must lift = 58 pounds. Not too difficult. If your leg muscles were accustomed to lifting 160-165 pounds on Earth, yeah, it's mighty easy to lift 58 pounds on the moon. Remember, weight and mass are different concepts. Slowing yourself down involves stopping the momentum of MASS (which doesn't change). Lifting yourself off the ground involves lifting WEIGHT (which depends on the different gravity conditions).

    90. e.

      19:18 a white object moving away from the surface of the moon? What the heck is that? o.O

      1. Atlas

        ice is my guess.

    91. Adones Lumondang

      I love Apollo 13 cause of their bravery

    92. USAF#1

      Why in fk is majority twats working on and narrating this so-called man on moon event all British... last I recall, no maine to californistank, antiffy washington to florida or anti-white horiiee to alaska to florida have and had any socialistic british accents.... then you take a combat active duty pilot serving in 105’s in viet nam to selection only to be dropped by a tree hugging rock collector whom has nothing for this nation. Our taxes pay for this shite while having no say. Now we’re paying taxes to support a bunch of shite Congress and senate traitors whom kiss the asses of an incompetent space case biden, xiden, there but not there, and whom is controlled by two racist to their core semi black communist leaning socialists of the names of Harris/rice... give money to non Americans and companies/corporations over actual Americans, American citizens. Traitors to our nation, betrayal to Americans working, supporting these socialist racist anti white, conservative, capitalist, Christian -pro Israeli pro military/law enforcement heterosexual males...

    93. Troy Davis

      Funny how thumbs down to comments are turned off...

      1. Apollo Skyfacer

        No, it isn't. Like the thumbs up, it only registers in units of one hundred.

    94. Michelle Main

      This was 100% fake!! Really!! research it like i did and GET COMPLETELY DISAPPOINTED LIKE I DID!! i am sooo serious, Neil Armstrong even is admits it finally!!

      1. Atlas

        I researched it and came to the conclusion it's real.

      2. Apollo Skyfacer

        Ok, We get it. You're the custodian of 'special' insider information and knowledge. All the hundreds of thousands of people involved in the development and eventual success of the SIX Apollo Moon Landings were, and are, the 'fake artists'. That'd include the Engineers and Scientists. The Mathematicians and Physicists. But not you of course. You're a member of a 'special' group of very clever and knowledgeable people who are 'in the know' about all this. Yeah, ------------------------ right. You're 'special', that's for sure. A special ongoing sick joke. But it's not even a funny joke, It's actually sad and pathetic. Modern History about the Apollo Moon Program is what it is. NOT what you think or want to believe it to be. No one cares who you are or what you believe. Away from Utube, you're a nobody. 100%

    95. dawn nite

      U liars...how can u still pretend

      1. dawn nite

        @Apollo Skyfacer thankz for reply need to wear shades everytime i go out now

      2. eventcone

        Could it be you've got the whole thing wrong?

      3. Apollo Skyfacer

        So says Mr Knowledgable

    96. Raul Oshiro

      384,000 miles from Earth there is a clear signal in 1969 hahaha

      1. rockethead7

        YOU SAID: "384,000 miles from Earth" == Pffttt. Really? That's how far away you think the moon is? YOU SAID: "there is a clear signal in 1969" == Well, not super clear. But, what's your point? What EXACTLY would prevent the signal from working? YOU SAID: "hahaha" == Yes, looking in the mirror must cause you lots of laughter.

      2. Atlas

        The first EME bounce was performed in the 1950s, my dude.

      3. Apollo Skyfacer

        Instead of coming here parroting the same tiresome ignorant questions, how about reading up on the subject properly instead. You know, get educated. How about typing in search, something like HOW DID THE APOLLO MISSIONS COMMUNICATE WITH MISSION CONTROL. A whole lot of information will be at your disposal. Get enlightened.

    97. Ray Sutton

      Why are most of your narrators Britts. Don’t we haveAmericans who can speak and read?

      1. Atlas

        Why does it matter?

      2. eventcone

        Its not only Americans who make documentaries about the Apollo program. It wasn't only Americans who worked on the Apollo program.

    98. Paul Gray

      Hey everyone take a real close look at appollo 17 when it looks like he's trying to golf on the moon dude is actually poking at something slow it down you can see something,not a golf ball, rolling out,then he sees that thing on the horizon coming, and bails

    99. Steven Van

      The pointless withdrawal visually prefer because can corroboratively haunt plus a depressed step-grandmother. elegant, puzzling floor

    100. Travis-2313

      Just more BS

      1. Apollo Skyfacer

        Just another brain dead ' Troll