Gravitational Lensing

Veritasium

1,4 млн көрүүлөр86

    In 2015 astronomers successfully predicted the appearance of a supernova within a couple weeks. How did they do it? Win your Ultimate Tech Bundle by entering Fasthosts’ Techie Test here: fasthosts.com/veritasium (Competition now closed) This video was sponsored by Fasthosts.
    Special thanks to Geraint Lewis for consulting on gravitational lensing. Check out his KGup channel: ve42.co/gfl and books: ve42.co/GFLbooks
    The supernova image in the thumbnail is from my documentary, Uranium: Twisting The Dragon's Tail. Check it out here: genepoolproductions.com/uranium-project
    References:
    DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN: THE REAPPEARANCE OF SUPERNOVA REFSDAL
    P. L. Kelly et al. arxiv.org/abs/1512.04654
    Predicted properties of multiple images of the strongly lensed supernova SN Refsdal
    Masamune Oguri. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Volume 449, Issue 1, 01 May 2015, Pages L86-L89, arxiv.org/abs/1411.6443
    Multiple Images of a Highly Magnified Supernova Formed by an Early-Type Cluster Galaxy Lens
    Patrick L. Kelly et al. arxiv.org/abs/1411.6009
    "Refsdal" meets Popper: comparing predictions of the re-appearance of the multiply imaged supernova behind MACSJ1149.5+2223. T. Treu et al. arxiv.org/abs/1510.05750
    Irwin I. Shapiro (1964). "Fourth Test of General Relativity". Physical Review Letters. 13 (26): 789-791. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789
    Irwin I. Shapiro; Gordon H. Pettengill; Michael E. Ash; Melvin L. Stone; et al. (1968). "Fourth Test of General Relativity: Preliminary Results". Physical Review Letters. 20 (22): 1265-1269. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1265
    Research & Writing by Stephanie Hamilton, Ralph Crewe, Petr Lebedev, Derek Muller, and Jonny Hyman
    Animations & VFX by Jonny Hyman & Ivàn Tello
    Thanks to Jaime Portsmouth for his gravitational lensing simulator and help enabling it to render simulations.
    Supernova simulations courtesy of Adam Burrows
    Numerous hubble images by Hubble Legacy Archive, NASA/ESA/STScI
    Numerous images by ESO / NASA

    күнү жарыяланды Ай мурун

    Жорумдар

    1. jung lee

      The vast viscose ultrascructurally practise because color accordingly appreciate plus a screeching education. vagabond, various methane

    2. bizzo

      Madam X AKA Madonna

    3. Adesh Thawale

      At 7:43 the paper refers to data taken by Arecibo. RIP

    4. Peter Milanovski

      I don't know who questioned Newton's theory of gravity but I really want to know who it is and if that person had his own theory. I also don't like Newton's laws of gravity and I don't like Einstein's either. It's not much of a theory if it works somewhere and not somewhere else and I will be damned if I'm using two different theories for different situations, that to me just screams that something is missing or just not really understood well enough.

      1. Релёкс84

        Einstein's theory of general relativity is a more precise theory and reduces to Newtonian mechanics when the speeds involved are very small compared to the speed of light. So Newtonian gravity is a valid approximation of Einstein's theory that is much simpler to work with and works extremely well for relatively slow objects, which is the case for almost everything we encouter in everyday life. The two are not incompatible with each other and they are both right, it's ust that one is more precise than the other and works accurately in more situations.

    5. Mahiya Jesi

      The sudden cabbage coincidingly puncture because dentist lately skip lest a harsh father-in-law. mixed, terrific knickers

    6. Jake Stewart

      The cowardly pamphlet visually avoid because russian aditionally earn on a staking meteorology. naughty, energetic hair

    7. James Bates

      I believe it was Newton himself, who expressed those reservations about the mechanism of gravity.

    8. DANG JOS

      Incredible video and fascinating! It's always surprising how good scientists are at figuring things out!

    9. Czesław Władysław Wielgus Marynowski

      Erwin Shapiro_:_Ben Shapiro?

    10. Jock Graves

      Greetings from Entropy

    11. Taxpayer juliet

      Which artist do you want to drop an album right now?

    12. ஆகாஷ் - AKASH. SIVAH.

      9:36, I understand he didn't cover thus due to maybe its complexity, but how do we know some of the stars absolute luminosity?

    13. Kevin Merioles

      6:24 😏

    14. mdu2112

      The reverb of the small recording room is made more obvious by the background outdoor scene.

    15. Adam Wyatt

      Nice video. Unfortunately a slight error: you mentioned the a contribution to the time-delay comes from the fact that the wide-angled rays travelled further than the shallow-angled rays, but this is false. The reason why the rays "bend" is because the speed of propagation changes and thus causing the wavefront to curve, and as a result the optical path length (and hence delay) is the same regardless which path is taken. This of course neglects dispersion and time-dilation and assumes perfect imaging. As the time-dilation in our own solar system showed, I presume that is the dominant effect for the time-delay.

    16. Bijan Izadi

      Megaparsec is so cool to say

    17. Adwaith Reddy

      Do one thing tell the person on Mars to send his time and blast Mars at the same time (Assuming it takes 20 mins for light to travel from earth to mars and instantaneous for light to travel from mars to earth ) Earth send message at 12 :10 Mars recieves at 12 :30 but the person thinks it is at 12 :20 and send a message that the time is 12:20 and instantaneously blast Mars Now if earth saw mars in real time earth will see Mars blast at 12 :30 and earth will also receive a message that it is 12: 20 and hence proved that the previous assumption was correct that it takes 20mins for the light to go to mars and instantaneously comes back to earth

    18. 邹捷

      Gravitational lensing blows my mind. "Oh, those four galaxies you can see over there? Yeah, they're the same one..." Madness.

    19. ImpactoDelSur Enterprise

      Is it possible that some of those celestial objects that we observed so far have gone through so many "layers" of gravitational lensing that what we are looking at might be in the direction of other side of the earth?

    20. random email

      INCREDIBLE CARS AND INVENTIONS OF THE NEXT GENERATION www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGfn-...

    21. Mick

      Dear chat and @Veritasium can black give rise to star or explode to create new stars. Is this possible. Plz help

    22. Adobe Reviews

      Spacetime be like: But, will it bend?

    23. Amedeo Filippi

      I wonder how we can be sure all our cosmological conclusions and theories can be true if everything we can observe is based on the electromagnetic spectrum we get through our different kinds of detecting instruments and at same time we know that all these objects in the sky are no longer where we locate them and also that their emitted EM waves are all distorted and scattered during their so long journeys to reach us “ now “

    24. ryuhjn yguh

      I cant even visualise that when a supernova explodes, in less than a second tens of thousands of miles of matter and gas covers the surrounding space.

    25. Pax Webb

      Mind blown… again

    26. Shay Detert

      Theoretically let's say you could teleport anywhere instantaneously and no matter where you were you could survive for a set amount of time if you traveled somewhere off in the distance of space and looked at earth would that be considered time travel because you are looking at light that has been reflected off the earth in the past now traveling to the planet you are on

    27. Aaron Gayod

      6:29 *:)*

    28. Akash Gupta

      Can you make a video on Super Symmetry please???

    29. MrLaTEchno Reality,Stop Fake News.

      ....so part time-machine-like observation ..?... to see time like this makes you wonder. If time is this "easy "to watch how can we " put some tools to it" so we can use it in different way's. B.D.W is it : Hawkeye .....lol.

    30. Weiss Merlin

      I have long waited for a mind blow like this. thank you for granting me such a treasure

    31. Astropj

      "Hey there's a new supernova on that galaxy! Never mind, it's just the same galaxy's lensed pic delayed due to gravity".

    32. Julian Harley

      The universal equivalent of a photo bomb

    33. 9B 34 Dominic

      so well explained.

    34. RIZE RenNerdClub

      Einstein?

    35. JustMoseyinAround

      *BeetleJuice, BeetleJuice, BeetleJu-*

      1. Taxpayer juliet

        derek: einstien's concept my brain: salt and pepper

    36. pokfen

      About a year to late. On astronomy I had to write a paper about Gravitational lensing. Good thing your video about Black Hole and how it looks like helped. I even linked than video in that.

    37. ronkirk50

      I'm absolutely goob smacked!

    38. Sutairn

      WIth this information we should be able to create a concrete equation on how much our movement is effecting redshift, why do we not see this equation when calculating the Hobble Constant?

    39. Jacob Sawyer

      any day now ... *in the next 100,000 years*

    40. Bo Reed

      I'm on this guys wavelength so frickn happy you made this rite on man

    41. SKM GAMER

      Do galaxies revolves around some things?🤔

    42. h.s.mani deep

      Looks like the supernova came to bargain.

    43. Big Dogo

      1:40 "In the next hundred THOUSAND years." :(

    44. Big Dogo

      Gravitational lensing blows my mind. "Oh, those four galaxies you can see over there? Yeah, they're the same one..." Madness.

    45. Sourav Dey

      What I thought of this ?? Wowweee... please teach me how did they measure the trajectories and times so accurately.... what math is behind this?? If they published a paper??

    46. Alberto Malvido

      One of my favorites video! Thank you so much

    47. Gplayer

      "In 2015 astronomers successfully predicted the appearance of a supernova within a couple weeks." Technically, that was not successfully predicted a supernova(the event happened at the end life circle of the star far far away), just predicted what image(what we would see from the Earth) the Hubble telescope would get according to the video, which were two different things. Am i right?😉😉😉😉

      1. Wandering Dust

        That's the actual image. Yes, it already happened and we are only seeing it now. Not exactly a prediction but it takes time for information to pass.

    48. Makaveli Thedon

      He said stars in nearby universe by mistake. Lol 9:31

    49. Diego Ferreyra

      Where’s the universe expanding FROM?

    50. a b

      We are so lucky to have Einsten

    51. Unknown Prodigy

      This is incredible. I don't know what else to say.

    52. Reuben Stern

      Makes you realize space is mind blowingly massive.

    53. Reuben Stern

      A long time ago In a galaxy far far away?... Proof of Darth sidius and his death star.

    54. arnav sood

      Einstein cross Jesus Christ!

    55. Yuda Dwi

      Soo... Does it mean that if we have a telescope sharp enough to see individual planet on galaxies far far away, and strong enough to catch light reflected from earth, we can technically see our past?

    56. James Blackstar

      Good hosting, not everyday i see.

    57. JebClang

      A lens made of "graveity". Yeah right, what sorcery is this? Gravity doesn't even existt

    58. Denzyl Casuela

      We can predict a supernova but not corona?

      1. Maciej Cholewa

        Maybe because universe changes but very slowly compared to it's size, when viruses mutate fast, thus we can't predict all mutations.

    59. Harish Dubey

      I wish i was not in a city so i could see this rare phenomenon

    60. klaas victor

      This is the most surprising video I have seen in my life! It got me Goosebumps! Humans are incredible to have discovered this!

    61. Bhaskar Bhardwaj

      The previous video title was more juicy, at least I feel

    62. Willian

      Amazing

    63. Panarbore

      absolutely adoreable to be able to work on such topics!

    64. Rama Bandyopadhyay

      So...The flat earthers are not wrong! They are right in another perspective

    65. Mohd Sameer

      Your videos are lit 👍🏻

    66. Andrey Sergeev

      Thank you! Ah...I thought it will be about building a lens for a gravity laser. But this is very interesting too.

    67. Phantomrocks #phani

      Meanwhile supernovas image giving us a creepy smile at 6:25

    68. yogesh jangid

      Can anyone tell me how light is traveling in a curved path..I have learned that light travels in straight line.

      1. Andrey Sergeev

        I don't know what does really moving straight means but let's say it is moving while being not affected (accelerated) by any force. That means nothing is changing the momentum of a photon I guess. I would naively say that light indeed travels in a straight line through space but if you bend space itself then that line is no longer straight. Photons have no mass - gravity does not pull them as regular objects with mass. The gravity is bending space and time therefore anything in that space is bent too. You can draw a straight line on a paper sheet then crumple that paper - so the line will be straight relative to the paper but not to the world around it. That way path of light is curved. That means that the direction of a photon is changed - so its momentum. So I will guess you need to spend some gravitational energy on that. But what is the least possible degree of that curvature? That I don't know. If you look at curved lines on a display they are made from pixels - so any circle is in fact a sum of small straight segments. If that is the case for space curving then there are always some parts of space where light indeed travels in a straight line - because it can't be affected by any force. If not then you can arrange a bending of any degree at any place so it's not necessary to have any straight segments at all.

    69. John Berry

      Wait til' the UK viewers find out that the 5000 pound Techie Bundle actually weighs 5000 pounds (

    70. Mahmoud Mostafa

      it was Isaac Newton.

    71. DevN

      when my boss catches me in a foto somewhere else..can i explain that its perhaps gravitational lensing...both time and place r incorrect..i was actually working at home ;)

    72. DevN

      and millions of people r convinced they know it all from 1 holy book.

    73. Trying1 /

      It sucks

    74. Ryan Johnstone

      amazing !!!!

    75. Chris Methot

      This just reinforces a question I have had for over 10 years. Using the discipline of the null hypothesis prove to me that every galaxy you see in the cosmos isn't the same galaxy seen from a different angle at a different time? The cosmos as a hall of mirrors.

      1. Chris Methot

        The first answer might be how could we see galaxies merging if there were only one.

    76. Kinnari Bhalerao

      Gravitational lensing is one of my favourite concepts!! And this is amazing!!! Loved the way the video is made. Seemed like we are in space!!!🌌

    77. Muhammad Hamza Tahir

      Space has always been an inspiration for me. Hubble is fascinating my heart day by day.

    78. Gabriel Ferrão

      Star: Betelgeuse Me: Be tel gese Veritasium: Bettle Juice

    79. FezRez

      Its incredible how much info scientists can extract from these tiny little smears of light

    80. Wu Chenglin

      1:32 beetlejuice

    81. Prince Fel Ezekiel R. Licardo

      It's fascinating that how much information astronomers can get from pictures, from a normal person, not so much.

    82. Dennis D

      And here I struggle getting a decent pic of my dog.

    83. Nae Dolor

      Is this one of the first generation stars in the universe ?

    84. David M. Johnston

      Great video Derek, thank you for teaching me so many interesting things! By the way, I'm just thinking... I've been following you since 2013. Most of my closest friends I've known for less time than that. And your videos continue to amaze me! Take care Derek, and keep up the excellent work! (no pressure :-)

    85. Learning Unity

      did you break the space time continuum? no worries, just seal it with FLEX TAPE! *slaps tape on spacetime*

    86. 恭喜你

      Only Legends Know the Title of This Video Has Been Changed

    87. Mr. Thomas A. Anderson

      I love your videos! You make them entertaining and you have a catchy voice.

    88. Soumen Bhattacharya

      Varitasium and 3brown1 blue are best ones also PBS videos too

    89. Fredrik Attila Farkas

      Does this mean that light can «move» an object aswell? Like airflow over a wing creating lift?

      1. Lünkel

        You can push stuff with light. There's the idea of "light sails", large reflective structures that can be put on a probe or satellite of some kind and allow it to use the solar wind. And last year or the year before that the nobel prize in physics got awarded to a team who created a kind of "tweezers" with light.

    90. Mohammed Shaik

      3:48 Damn that looks creepy lmao

    91. Balubish Tech

      This is mindblowing sorta. Also makes me feel incredicle dumb compared to actual smart people. I knew math was important and read electronics in high school so did alot of math. But counting math that bends light by gravity and mass vs distance and time to the object and beeing able to count that far back including by my guess a ton of gravity bends/warps between stars, galaxies of the fabric of space, with an end result of different years and times to the day, which you can view the same exact thing happening. 🤯 Now thats some hardcore math right there.🧠 Also how isnt Einstein an Emoji by now. 😎✌

    92. seachangeau

      Oh its such crap.

    93. Jimmy Johns

      Wow, this really opens your mind! It’s like taking drugs OMG. Loved it!

    94. Mohd Shariq

      6:29 Seems deep space is smiling on us!..with a cigarette in its mouth! 😵

    95. Lar Wor Tsomv

      What if, as the universe expands, the general speed of light increases? Meaning, if we had a window into the future we would observe everything moving faster. This does not affect the Doppler shift, which only cares about the 'stretching out' of light as it moves, since all 'parts' of light will be speeding up at the same time so there will be no differential that would be evidenced in the color shift. However it may 'speed up' other observable cosmic activity, meaning light reaches us faster than expected if it were moving at a 'constant' speed. Therefore the calculated expansion rate of some methods gives a lower result.

    96. raedtrab

      Am I still on time to answer the question? Which is actually wrong it was Sir Isaac Newton who answered to RICHARD BENTLEY (theologian and philologist) “That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left open to the consideration of my readers” this was in answer to And what Richard Bentley wrote that generated Sir Isaac Newton’s answer was And as for gravitation, tis impossible that that should either be coeternal and essential to matter, or ever acquired by it. Not essential and coeternal to matter; for then even our system would have been eternal (if gravity could form it) against our atheist's supposition and what we have proved in our last. For let them assign any given time, that matter convened from a chaos into our system, they must affirm that before the given time matter gravitated eternally without convening, which is absurd. {Sir, I make account, that your courteous suggestion by your last, that a chaos is inconsistent with the hypothesis of innate gravity, is included in this paragraph of mine.} and again, tis unconceivable, that inanimate brute matter should (without a divine impression) operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact: as it must, if gravitation be essential and inherent in it.

    97. Kumar Digvijay Mishra

      Gravitational lens smears images from Hubble telescope. What is the cure for distortion? Apart from making intelligent assumptions/guesses, there seems to be no other method to give a clearer image.

    98. sokin jon

      The Real Question: How do scientists notice a tiny dot of a star in the middle of so many blurs and other stars?!

      1. ryuhjn yguh

        “You will be able to see beetle juice’s supernova” Me: “Hmm”

      2. Michael Polakowski

        Generally, you can find the difference between two consecutive images by subtracting one from the other. Everything that's the same cancels, and only the changes remain. Also, in the case of the supernova in the video, they were expecting it to appear in a specific location.

      3. A G

        They don't. No, but with the power of modern technology, devoted people, and some of the smartest people on the globe many things are possible.

      4. Aadil Peer

        Unstoppable curiosity does it all...I am more surprised to know that there is actually stuff like time dilation.5 years out from physics and I thought it is all theoretical.Guess that's why flat earthers still exit.Might be of my kind:)

      5. Sourav Dey

        It’s their passion... they love to do that.. isn’t that amazing??

    99. ilkercan Kaya

      I want to live hundreds of years to observe and study all the knowledge in universe. Sadly humans life span isn't long enough for such thing. I want to discover new planets, understand what is behind this universe. I don't wanna die without knowing why I was here.

    100. Amadley Gaming

      Veritasium pumping out superlative quality content is one of the rare positive things about 2020 - How do they do it? That's the real mystery